The blog of the Roaring Fork Valley (Reform) Jewish community
77 Meadowood Drive • Aspen, CO • 81611
Rabbi David Segal and Cantor Rollin Simmons

Friday, June 14, 2013

Beyond Belief

Rabbi David Segal
Aspen Jewish Congregation
Parshat Chukat • 14 June 2013

Our ancestors went down to Egypt, and we dwelt in Egypt a long time, and the Egyptians dealt harshly with us and our ancestors. We cried to the Lord and He heard our plea, and He sent a messenger who freed us from Egypt.
(Numbers 20:15-16)

A favorite topic of mine, that I often raise, is the question: Do you believe in God? I've even asked for a show of hands before. My fascination with this question comes from our culture’s near obsession with it as THE central question of religion and religious affiliation. That, and its utter uselessness as a question. It doesn’t actually tell me much about you.

As Stanford Professor T.M. Luhrmann says in the NY Times (5/29/13) “Belief is the Least Part of Faith”: it’s a question that "university-educated liberals ask about faith." It's a deep question. But it's also abstract and intellectual, a philosophical question.

Luhrmann spent years studying evangelical churches and churchgoers. For them, the questions are different: how can we feel God’s love, and be more aware of God’s presence? “Those,” she says, “are fundamentally practical questions.”

That we are obsessed with the True/False questions of God’s existence, always demanding evidence, shows how deeply modern we are. Ancient Judaism took God as a given, so the questions became, how do we follow God’s will? How do we act as God’s agents in the world? How shall we interpret God’s word, since the authority to do that is in our hands? They were mercifully free of the nagging and neurotic modern questions that we ask: Does God exist? How do we know? How do we know if we know anything???

Thankfully, postmodern Judaism (to the extent there is such a thing...) is coming back around to the wisdom of not obsessing over these unanswerable and unproductive questions.

As Luhrmann wisely notes, secular Americans (and many Jews!) think that the key to understanding religion is knowing why people believe in God. In our “folk model of the mind,” she writes, we think that belief precedes action and explains choice, that belief comes first.

But that’s probably backward. As Rabbi Larry Hoffman teaches: theology emerges from experience. And from Emile Durkheim, famous sociologist (paraphrasing): You don’t go to church because you believe in God; rather, you believe in God because you go to church.

Belief is more like a unifying banner, a flag you raise and wave together, than an intellectual position arrived at by reasoned argument.

Here our tradition has always been a helpful guide. Moses, when speaking to a neighboring kingdom in this parashah, doesn’t define the Israelites as the people who believe in Adonai, but rather, he tells a story about relationship:
Our ancestors went down to Egypt, and we dwelt in Egypt a long time, and the Egyptians dealt harshly with us and our ancestors. We cried to Adonai and God heard our plea, and God sent a messenger who freed us from Egypt. (Numbers 20:15-16)
As a people, we are constantly anchoring ourselves, identifying ourselves, by our story -- not by our philosophical positions. (That is a medieval and modern excursion.)

Robert Alter -- professor, scholar, critic, translator, leading voice on Bible as literature -- teaches us how to approach our tradition in this way. He speaks of the Bible as a genius work(s) of literary achievement. For him, “This is not a demotion, but an elevation.” Approaching Scripture this way, and only this way, can we hope to fully grasp its layers of meaning, and apply it holistically to our lives and experiences. As one critic said, the Bible as great literature carries the “authority of imagination” rather than the authority of religion. This kind of authority -- softer than traditional legal and rabbinic authority -- is yet deeper, more enduring, more resonant. And it is more important for the future of Judaism, and what Judaism has to offer the world.

Alter is teaching us again about the Bible's literary value with Ancient Israel, a forthcoming translation and commentary of the books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings. These are more historically oriented books, depicting Israel as a political entity, struggling against warring tribes, idolatry within, and questions of leadership and social organization. (Watch for this as the basis of a future Adult Education class...)

And indeed my course this summer on contemporary Jewish short stories is in line with Alter and Luhrmann’s views of religion and text. If the Bible is the literature of its day, and these short stories are the literature of our day, they all have much to say to us about what it means to be a Jew, to be a human being, facing the questions of existence.

And our summer concert, too -- Beyond Belief: Sounds of Sacred Searching -- will be in a similar vein. It will feature interviews with valley locals, sharing their stories of faith and doubt, of struggle and affirmation. We envision it as a presentation not to “prove” a philosophical argument, but to lift up a network of stories and relationships that make this valley a spiritually special place.

Luhrmann concludes: "These days I find that it is more helpful to think about faith as the questions people choose to focus on, rather than the propositions observers think they must hold."

Let us continue to be defined by the questions we ask, and by the stories we tell of our ancestors’ quests, and our own. Let us leave for the next generation a legacy of questions, and the wisdom to ask them together in sacred community.

SHABBAT SHALOM.

Friday, June 7, 2013

Summer Session 2013 - Adult Ed

"Who Will Be For Me?"
Jewishness and Otherness in Selected Contemporary Jewish Short Stories
with Rabbi David Segal

Wednesdays 2:00-4:00 pm
July 3-August 14, 2013
Aspen Chapel Gallery

Course Summary

Over seven weeks this summer, we will read ~15 Jewish short stories by contemporary authors. Nathan Englander's recent collection What We Talk About When We Talk About Anne Frank and Jonathan Papernick's The Ascent of Eli Israel will be our primary reading, coupled with additional selections by Lara Vapnyar, Shalom Auslander, Joan Leegant, Etgar Keret, Savyon Liebrecht, and Scott Nadelson -- and three classics by Kafka, Ozick, and Roth. These stories will lead us to thought-provoking discussions about the following themes, among others: Jews relating to non-Jews; Jews relating to different Jews; search for authenticity and identity; exile and homecoming; sexuality; Holocaust and memory; Diaspora & Israel; the fractured Jewish experience in the modern world.

Registration Info

Suggested donation of $60/person includes all reading materials.
An additional $25 sponsors refreshments for a week.

Or contact Faith at the AJC office, 970-925-8245 or office@aspenjewish.org. 

If you are interested in enrolling long-distance via web-conferencing, the option is available; please contact Rabbi David at rabbi@aspenjewish.org or 970-925-8245 x.1.

Materials
Course packets are available from Rabbi David with registration. The other books are sold out locally but you can order them yourself online, either paperback or digital versions. They are:
• Nathan Englander, What We Talk About When We Talk About Anne Frank
• Jonathan Papernick, The Ascent of Eli Israel and Other Stories
• Joan Leegant, An Hour in Paradise

Syllabus
  1. July 3: To Hide or Not to Hide?
    1. Nathan Englander, "What We Talk About When We Talk About Anne Frank"
    2. Lara Vapnyar, "There Are Jews in My House"
    3. Emmanuel Litvinoff, "Introduction" from the Penguin Book of Jewish Short Stories (1979)
    4. optional - "General Introduction" from the Norton Anthology of Jewish American Literature
  2. July 10: A Room of One's Own?
    1. Jonathan Papernick, "An Unwelcome Guest"
    2. Etgar Keret, "Plague of the Firstborn"from The Bus Driver Who Wanted to be God & Other Stories
    3. Dara Horn, Introduction to Papernick's Ascent of Eli Israel
  3. July 17: A History of Violence...
    1. Nathan Englander, "Free Fruit for Young Widows"
    2. Etgar Keret, "Siren"from The Bus Driver Who Wanted to be God and Other Stories
    3. optional - Nathan Englander, "Camp Sundown"
  4. July 24: Otherness Embodied
    1. Shalom Auslander, "Metamorphosis" from Beware of God
    2. Jonathan Papernick, "The Art of Correcting"
    3. optional classic - Franz Kafka, "A Report to an Academy"
    4. optional - John Updike, Foreword to The Complete Stories of Franz Kafka
  5. July 31: Motherhood and Memory
    1. Savyon Liebrecht, "Morning in the Park Among the Nannies" from Apples in the Desert
    2. Jonathan Papernick, "For as Long as the Lamp is Burning"
    3. Grace Paley, Foreword to Savyon Liebrecht's Apples from the Desert
    4. optional classic - Cynthia Ozick, "The Shawl"
    5. optional - Lily Rattok, Introduction to Savyon Liebrecht's Apples from the Desert
  6. August 7: (Jewish) American Daughters
    1. Scott Nadelson, "The Cantor's Daughter"
    2. Joan Leegant, "The Lament of the Rabbi's Daughters" from An Hour in Paradise
  7. August 14: What Goes Up...
    1. Joan Leegant, "Seekers in the Holy Land" from An Hour in Paradise
    2. Jonathan Papernick, "The Ascent of Eli Israel"
    3. optional classic - Philip Roth, "Eli the Fanatic" from Goodbye, Columbus
Helpful links:


Tuesday, June 4, 2013

3rd Annual Summer Concert




Save the Date 
for our 3rd annual summer concert! 


This year's concert will be a refreshingly eclectic mix 
of new and not-so-new songs inspired by personal stories from our valley 
of spiritual journeys through childhood, faith, doubt, and gratitude. 

Tuesday, August 6, 5:00 pm 
Aspen District Theatre 
(at the Aspen Elementary School) 

featuring Aspen's own 

CANTOR ROLLIN SIMMONS 

along with multi-talented returning artists 
Elana Arian, Noah Aronson, Cantor Joshua Breitzer, and Joyce Rosenzweig, 
and first-time world class artists Cantor Andrea Rae Markowitz 
and Cantor Daniel Mutlu 

For patron tickets, please call our office, 970-925-8245. 
($750 per patron, includes catered dinner with musicians) 

Monday, May 20, 2013

Baccalaureate Speech - Aspen High School Class of 2013



Aspen High School Baccalaureate Service
Rabbi David Segal
Aspen Chapel • May 20, 2013

Congratulations to the Aspen High School Class of 2013, and to your parents, faculty, and friends. I’m honored to address you tonight.
Once upon a time, a father went to pick up his daughter from school and happened to overhear her talking to a friend.
     She said, “I'm really worried. Both my parents work full-time jobs to give me a really nice home, good food, and everything I could ever need. Then when they get home, they spend even more time cleaning the house, cooking, and taking care of me. I'm worried sick!”
     Her friend said, “What have you got to worry about? It sounds like you've got it made, with parents like that!”
     The daughter shook her head and said, “Sure, but what if they try to escape?”
I’m guessing there are a lot of mixed emotions in this room -- for you, the graduates, and for those who love you. Some of you probably can’t wait to get out on your own, craving your first taste of real independence. Some of you might be anxious about leaving the comfort of the known for the question mark that lies ahead. Most of you feel both, the push and pull of every life passage. Dr. Jonas Salk once said that good parents give their children roots and wings. Spreading your wings and testing their flight changes forever your link to your roots.

In the Jewish tradition, we’ve just celebrated the holiday of Shavuot. It marks the giving of the 10 Commandments by God to Moses on Mt. Sinai. This revelation of rules was the culmination of the Israelites’ redemption from Egyptian slavery, capping their hard-won independence with the responsibility that freedom demands. It was, in a sense, the Israelites’ graduation day. Naturally, many synagogues have come to connect Shavuot to high school graduation, with its parallel theme of negotiating independence and responsibility, which you will all experience when you leave home.

Now, I’m not suggesting that high school is like Egyptian oppression, or that your teachers are like taskmasters, or that it took an act of God to get you to graduation... although some of you might feel that way. But there is a mysterious episode in the Bible’s account of that miraculous day on a mountain that speaks to the mixed emotions you may be feeling at this threshold moment in your lives.

Toward the end of the Book of Exodus, Moses stands ready to climb the mountain -- again -- with a second set of tablets, on which God will write the 10 Commandments. (Moses broke the first set, you may recall, when he came down the mountain to find the Israelites partying a little too hard around a golden keg--er--calf...like a frat party gone horribly, sacrilegiously, wrong.) Moses worries about how he’s going to lead the people to the Promised Land, so he asks God for help: Lead us, show us favor, lighten my burden.

And then, Moses asks one thing more: “Please, show me Your Presence!” (Exodus 33:18). God agrees, sort of, for no human can see God and live. So God suggests an alternative: He’ll shield Moses with His hand in the cleft of a rock while He passes by, and then Moses can look at His back. It’s what God says during this “drive-by viewing” that speaks to us tonight:
...a God compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, with great mercy and faithfulness, extending mercy to the thousandth generation, forgiving sin... -- yet not dismissing all punishment, but visiting the sin of the parents upon children and children’s children, upon the third and fourth generation. (Exodus 34:6-7)
Here’s a quandary for a college theology class: how can God show mercy to a thousand generations, but also punish children for their parents' and grandparents’ mistakes? How to resolve this contradiction?

Well, one answer, which comes from the Bible itself, is simple: change it! That’s what the prophet Ezekiel does, centuries later:
The word of the LORD came to me: What do you mean by quoting this proverb..., “Parents eat sour grapes and their children’s teeth are blunted”? As I live — declares the Lord GOD — this proverb shall no longer be current among you... A child shall not share the burden of a parent’s guilt, nor shall a parent share the burden of a child’s guilt; the righteousness of the righteous shall be accounted to him alone, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be accounted to him alone. (Ezekiel 18:1-3, 20)
In other words, “I changed my mind.” In Exodus, God said that children will suffer the consequences of their parents’ actions. According to Ezekiel, all will be judged only according to their own choices.

Years ago I was teaching these texts to a group of young adults, asking them how to resolve the tension between Exodus and Ezekiel on parents and children. One student said it best: That tension, that paradox, is just the way the world is. Although we uphold a belief in our responsibility for our own actions, it’s simply true that we bear the consequences of our parents’ and grandparents’ choices, for better and for worse.

I suspect that you have all internalized a certain narrative, that through your hard work and perseverance you made it to this day. And now you’re about to step into real independence for the first time, where the world will challenge you to continue to achieve and succeed through your own efforts. In this story, self-sufficiency is the endgame. It would make Ezekiel proud: you, out in the world, forging your own path, accountable only for yourself.

But what God told Moses, about the chain of responsibility from generation to generation, also holds true. I experience this truth daily as the father of a toddler. His mother and I make choices for him continuously, as all parents do -- what he eats, where he goes to daycare and how often, what books he reads, how he gets disciplined. These choices, completely out of his control and unrelated to his merit, nonetheless will have a profound impact on how his life unfolds. And the world of choices available to me has been influenced and limited by my parents’ choices, and their parents’ choices -- to immigrate to this country before WWII, to settle in a particular city, to educate me at good schools, to support my decision to attend seminary...

There are forces in our society today, undergirded by political interests, who insist that either the Exodus or Ezekiel version of events is exclusively true. One of these voices says that you are a radically social being, having inherited all you have from those who came before, and owing all you achieve to those around you and those who come after you. You are dependent, you are vulnerable, and you accomplish nothing on your own. 

The other says that you are an atomized individual, an island of responsibility unto yourself, with the potential to be whatever you want to be, limited only by your imagination and drive. You are independent, you are on your own, and godspeed. 

The former, taken to its extreme, leads to guilt and self-doubt. It numbs the will to achieve and causes emotional paralysis and the neglect of our basic responsibilities.

The latter view leads to arrogance and smug complacency. Symptoms may also include greed and materialism. As Stephen Colbert, a satirical mouthpiece for this view, puts it, “I got mine, Jack!” 

I want to take a moment now to exercise my prerogative as your baccalaureate speaker, and offer my requisite piece of unsolicited advice: When you hear these two extreme voices, tune them out. They are toxic. 

We are neither islands nor cogs in a wheel. We are interdependent. A balanced and fulfilling life learns from the tension between the Exodus and Ezekiel stories and walks a middle path. This path leads not to arrogance or guilt but instead to the essential virtues of reverence, humility, and gratitude. It leads to a sense of responsibility, both for the universe of choices we’ve inherited, and for the effects of our choices on others.

Today, graduates, you deserve to feel proud. You worked hard and your efforts have paid off, but there’s no excuse for puffed up self-importance. My prayer for all of you, at this milestone and every day, is that you will carry yourselves as if you stand on the shoulders of giants. Because of those who laid the foundation, invested in you, believed in you -- you can see farther, dream bigger, achieve more. While you’re enjoying the view from the heights you’ve achieved, don’t forget to give thanks for the shoulders you stand on. And then one day, God willing, someone will stand on yours.

Thank you, and congratulations again.


Monday, April 1, 2013

AJC Purim on YouTube

Thanks to GrassrootsTV, our 2013 Purim spiel is now on YouTube. Enjoy!

SIGNED, SEALED, MEGILLAH: IT'S PURIM!

Monday, March 25, 2013

New Pope, Renewed Hope

Rabbi David Segal
Aspen Jewish Congregation
March 22, 2013 • Parshat Tzav

I had every intention of speaking tonight about President Obama's speech and tour in Israel this week. But the more I read, the more I realized I needed to read to be able to comment thoroughly and responsibly about it. So stay tuned for that topic another time... (In the meantime, I do highly recommend reading the speech in full.)

So I will share a few thoughts instead about another historic speech, given last Tuesday, as a new pope was inaugurated. This pope represents a number of firsts, including of course the first non-European pope in about 13 centuries. That in itself speaks to a new era for the Catholic Church

But this pope represents another 1st, and not just the first Francis (named, by the way, after St. Francis of Assisi, who was known for his care for the weak, the defenseless, the less fortunate of the world).

The other major milestone: Francis is the first Jesuit Pope. Why is this interesting? And is it, as we obsessively ask, good for the Jews? Answering those questions requires some background.

In the 16th century, Ignatius of Loyola, a Spanish Knight, founded the Society of Jesus, whose members were known as Jesuits. They were, in the main, more liberal toward Jews than the mainstream of the Catholic establishment. They even got themselves into trouble with the Church because of their openness.

After the Spanish expulsion in 1492, there remained New Christians -- Jews who converted to Christianity in order to remain in Spain. But soon suspicion grew that many of them were engaged in “Judaizing,” being Jews in secret and spreading their Judaism. Limpieza de sangre became the new standard of acceptance -- "purity of blood." Conversion was no longer good enough. Jewish blood -- Jewish ancestry -- was enough to condemn you. (This represents a haunting precursor to the Nazis’ genocidal policies, four centuries later.)

But as the Church moved in this racist direction, the Jesuits resisted, for a time. Only in 1593,  years after other Catholic groups had banned so-called “New Christians,” only then did the Jesuits. 

Part of their ban was their own fear of persecution: Apparently, the Jesuits, since they had welcomed Jewish-born converts, had many members of Jewish descent, including some high-ranking. This led King Phillip II of Spain to refer to the Jesuits as “a synagogue of Hebrews.” At any rate, despite early resistance, the Jesuits did ban Jewish blood from their membership, and in 1608 defined that as within 5 generations. This ban was officially lifted in -- brace yourself -- 1946! But one scholar points out that it probably wasn't enforced for some time before that.

Fast forward to 1965, and a landmark decree by the Catholic Church, called Nostra Aetate. It defined a new relationship with Jews, people of an everlasting covenant with God. And it rejected anti-Semitism and the old theology of Jews' bearing the guilt for the death of Jesus. It was a German Jesuit, Augustin Bea, who played a crucial role in advancing Nostra Aetate.

And today, we can say with confidence, that Jesuits are at the forefront of Jewish-Catholic dialogue. There is so much cooperation that, as one scholar notes, an internet search shows, among contemporary anti-Catholic voices, there is disproportionate focus on Jesuits; they are sometimes even accused of being controlled by Jews!

Look also at Jesuit universities, where Jewish Studies are an important component. Many Chairs of Jewish or Holocaust Studies at Jesuit or otherwise Catholic colleges are funded by Jews. And there is a certain similarity in the ethos of Jesuits and Jews: ours is a faith shorn up by serious scholarship and study. We embrace critical thinking and social justice in our religious lives.

Pope Francis I seems to embody this best of Jesuit attitudes toward Jews. His only published book, a dialogue of faiths, was co-authored with an Argentine rabbi. As Cardinal of Buenos Aires, he responded firmly in 1994 when terrorists bombed the city’s JCC, killing 85 people. He worked publicly  to combat terrorism throughout his career. He has also stated that the Vatican’s WWII and Holocaust archives should be made public, and has been critical of the Church’s role with Nazi Germany.

Jewish groups throughout the world are hailing this new pope with optimism that he will continue the advances of Pope John Paul II of deepening ties with world Jewry and with Israel.

And the new pope, in his inaugural speech, did not disappoint. In the first moments, as he officially recognized visiting guests, he said:
I offer a warm greeting to my brother cardinals and bishops, the priests, deacons, men and women religious, and all the lay faithful. I thank the representatives of the other Churches and ecclesial Communities, as well as the representatives of the Jewish community and the other religious communities, for their presence.
Not only had he invited this Jewish delegation, but he met with them the next day. And in accord with recent custom, after his election he offered an official greeting to the Chief Rabbi of Rome, Riccardo di Segni.

For another time, I’ll leave the conversation about how much influence the Catholic Church, and therefore the Pope, even has today. Mired in scandals and misconduct, the Church is losing ground, at least in the USA. Not to mention as part of the larger trend away from organized religion, across the board. But in the meantime, I give thanks for the optimism of this moment. That perhaps this new leadership may bring the Church to a place of being a more powerful force for good in the world. 

I’ll close with Pope Francis I’s own words from his inaugural mass:
Saint Paul speaks of Abraham, who, “hoping against hope, believed” (Rom 4:18). Hoping against hope! Today too, amid so much darkness, we need to see the light of hope and to be men and women who bring hope to others. To protect creation, to protect every man and every woman, to look upon them with tenderness and love, is to open up a horizon of hope; it is to let a shaft of light break through the heavy clouds; it is to bring the warmth of hope! 
Sounds like the Jewish mission in the world, too.

Shabbat shalom, and Chag Pesach Sameach



P.S. There are still other questions to explore regarding Pope Francis I's background, in particular during Argentina's "Dirty War" (See, for example, this article), as well as his attitudes toward women and homosexuality.


Friday, March 15, 2013

Locusts: to eat or not to eat?


Jessica Slosberg, Director of Education
Aspen Jewish Congregation
March 15, 2013 • Parshat Vayikra


We are now in the book of Vayikra or Leviticus, which consists of about three months of rules. There are rules about pretty much anything and everything you can imagine. Sometimes when I have a question I like to go through Vayikra and see if it is addressed directly or indirectly (it is a Hebrew school teacher thing). There are rules for sacrificing, building, clothing, slaves; the list goes on. And, of course, there are rules about food. What we can eat – what we can’t eat – how we can eat what - who can eat what when.  Educators, rabbis and parents go to great lengths to make this book interesting, which is no small task– there is even an iPhone app (see me later for details). 

Now as an educator, I am always gleeful when there is a real-life application (beyond the iPad) and this year we have one. As we approach Pesach there is incredibly large swarm of locusts in Egypt and moving to Israel. Now the locust swarm happens every year; but this is one of the biggest and being so near Passover is chuckle worthy in itself. However, there is a ferocious debate in Israel and that is: Are they the kosher kind of locust? Are they kosher for everyone? Who can serve them? And, of course, who is the correct person to say they whether they are kosher or not.

We are going to skip ahead a few chapters. In Vayikra 11:22-23 it says: “These you are allowed to eat: any kind of locust, and any kind of bald locust, any kind of cricket, and any kind of grasshopper. But all [other] winged swarming things, which have four feet, are a detestable thing unto you [and should not be eaten.”

The problem is, by the time the Talmud was codified most communities had lost the mesorah, the knowledge and tradition of eating locusts – as in which are kosher and which aren’t – except in Northern Africa and Yemen. These communities have continued to eat locusts all the way through. Now one rabbi already has said these locusts should be considered not kosher by all Israelis. A different rabbi said that he needs to examine them first before he can make a determination; he works for Institute for the Study of Agricultural Torah Commandments in Israel.

A similar locust event happened in 2005, and rabbis determined that they were the kosher kind of locust. It was even determined that Ashkenazi Jews, who traditionally side on the most stringent interpretations of the law, could eat them if they were served by a Jew from North Africa and Yemen.
This got me thinking about the value of experience. It also seems that in this day and age we all want to be experts – on everything. Having so much information at our fingertips makes it easy to forget that we are not actually experts on everything. Sometimes we need to be willing to defer to the real expert – the one with experience. Not only does this not make us weak it but in fact we become stronger and it shows that we are willing to grow. As Albert Einstein said, “A person who never made a mistake never tried anything new.”  I know this is something that I struggle with, wanting to be THE expert – sometimes I am and sometimes I am not. But every time I know I don’t have to be the expert and can ask for help I consider that a victory. It is not always easy but I am making baby steps.

Hopefully we all can recognize in our lives when we are the experts and when we should just eat the locusts.